The exchange began after Nana Boadi Amponim Abodade III reportedly made remarks that Agyepong described as disrespectful and unnecessary.
Speaking during an appearance on Kessben TV, the former Presidential Press Secretary departed from his usually calm tone to address the issue directly.
“If he does not respect himself, we respect ourselves,” Agyepong said, a statement that quickly gained traction across social and political circles.
The comment has since become a talking point, with many Ghanaians debating whether the politician went too far or merely defended his dignity in the face of provocation.
Agyepong explained that his response was not intended to insult traditional authority but to draw attention to what he sees as unacceptable public language from someone occupying a revered cultural position.
According to him, traditional leaders are expected to speak with restraint and wisdom, especially when addressing individuals in public life.
He stressed that he was raised in a disciplined environment and comes from a royal background where respect is deeply valued.
For that reason, he found it troubling that a chief would use language he considers derogatory, including labeling him and his supporters with terms many view as insulting.
“I was raised to respect people and institutions,” he said.
“But respect must be mutual.”
The incident has sparked broader discussions about the role of chiefs in political discourse.
While traditional leaders are respected custodians of culture and community values, some Ghanaians believe their involvement in partisan commentary risks undermining their neutrality.
Political analysts are divided. One school of thought argues that chiefs should remain above partisan politics to maintain moral authority and unity within their communities.
Another view holds that traditional leaders have the right to express opinions, especially when political decisions affect their people.
Social commentators note that the controversy reflects growing tension between modern politics and traditional governance.
As politicians become more visible and outspoken, and chiefs increasingly engage national issues, clashes like this may become more common.
Agyepong has made it clear that he will not apologize for defending himself but insists he still respects traditional institutions as pillars of Ghanaian society.
He urged all public figures—political and traditional alike—to choose their words carefully and uphold dignity in public discourse.
“This country belongs to all of us,” he said.
“Leadership, whether political or traditional, should bring people together, not divide them.”