His remarks were made during a televised panel discussion on ATV that focused on the NPP’s flagbearer race and the personalities seeking to lead the party into the next general election.
Speaking during the programme, Alhaji Masawudu Osman argued that despite belonging to opposing political parties, Kennedy Agyapong and John Mahama share notable similarities in their political approach and public image.
According to him, when one carefully examines their styles of engagement, influence on the electorate, and overall political impact, the two figures appear more alike than different.
This comparison has attracted attention given that Kennedy Agyapong is a prominent and outspoken member of the ruling NPP, while Mahama remains the leading figure of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC).
The discussion took place amid intense analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of potential presidential candidates within the NPP.
Osman’s comments appeared to center on what he described as the populist appeal both politicians command.
Kennedy Agyapong is widely known for his blunt, no-holds-barred communication style and his readiness to openly criticize even members of his own party.
This approach has won him strong support among sections of the public who admire his outspokenness.
Similarly, John Mahama is often viewed as a relatable political figure with a strong grassroots connection.
As a former president, he brings experience and a loyal support base shaped by his previous time in office.
By drawing a parallel between the two, Osman may be implying that Kennedy Agyapong’s political style could produce dynamics similar to those Mahama presents in national elections.
The timing of the statement is particularly significant as the NPP prepares to select a flagbearer capable of maintaining the party’s hold on power.
A major concern among party delegates is identifying a candidate who can effectively compete against John Mahama.
Osman’s comparison challenges party members to reflect on whether leadership style alone is enough to offer a clear alternative to the opposition.
Reactions to the comments have been mixed. Supporters of Kennedy Agyapong have questioned the fairness of the comparison, while others believe the statement underscores how personality and public perception increasingly shape Ghana’s political landscape.
Regardless of differing opinions, the remarks have added fresh energy to ongoing discussions about leadership, identity, and strategy ahead of the next elections.