Speaking on Metro TV, Poku addressed criticisms that Bawumia misled Ghanaians by promising to improve the economy but failing to deliver on those expectations.
According to Poku, many people have labeled Bawumia a liar because of his economic pledges, particularly his assurances that the economy would be strengthened under his leadership.
However, Poku argued that failing to achieve those promises does not automatically make Bawumia a liar.
He explained that political leaders often set ambitious targets, and while some may not materialize due to unforeseen challenges, that does not mean the intent behind the promise was dishonest.
This distinction between failed promises and deliberate falsehoods has become the center of the debate.
Poku’s defense suggests that Bawumia’s economic vision was genuine, even if the outcomes fell short of expectations.
He emphasized that leadership should be judged on effort and policy direction rather than branding individuals as liars when circumstances prevent full delivery.
Twum Boafo, however, has maintained that Bawumia’s credibility is questionable, pointing to repeated assurances about stabilizing the economy that did not materialize.
For critics, the gap between promise and reality is enough to justify accusations of dishonesty.
Supporters of Poku’s position counter that such accusations oversimplify the complexities of economic management, especially in a global environment marked by inflation, debt restructuring, and external shocks.
The exchange highlights the broader political struggle over narratives of trust and accountability.
As Ghana prepares for future elections, the debate over whether Bawumia’s economic promises were lies or simply unfulfilled ambitions will continue to shape public opinion.
Poku’s challenge to Twum Boafo has ensured that the conversation remains alive, forcing both supporters and critics to reconsider how political promises should be judged.