In a Facebook post dated 11 April 2026, Sarpong directed his remarks at veteran journalist Abdul Malik Kweku Baako, referencing past activism involving broadcaster Kwesi Pratt Jr and contrasting it with what he sees as limited public commentary on current discussions surrounding Damang, an area associated with mining interests and economic activity.
Sarpong recalled an earlier incident in which Kwesi Pratt Jr. reportedly staged a symbolic protest against the purchase of a hotel by the son of former President John Agyekum Kufuor.
He described the act as a public demonstration that included what he termed a “one-shot” photo moment, which he used to illustrate what he considers a strong and visible stance on perceived public interest concerns at the time.
Drawing on that reference, Sarpong questioned why similar levels of vocal criticism or public engagement are not being seen in relation to ongoing conversations about Damang.
His post suggested that public intellectuals and journalists should maintain consistent scrutiny regardless of the individuals or institutions involved.
“Uncle Abdul Malik Kweku Baako, do you remember your brother, Uncle Pratt, protested against JAK’s son buying a hotel that belonged to a Lebanese, went to take ‘one shot’ photo? What’s he saying about Damang?” he wrote, framing the question as both reflective and critical.
The remarks have since generated discussion across social media platforms, with some users agreeing that public commentators should apply equal standards of accountability across all political and economic issues.
Others, however, cautioned that historical comparisons may not always reflect the complexities of current developments, particularly where context and circumstances differ.
While Sarpong did not provide detailed allegations regarding Damang, his comments have nonetheless added momentum to ongoing conversations about transparency, selective criticism, and the role of influential media voices in shaping national debate.
The exchange underscores a recurring theme in Ghana’s political landscape — the scrutiny not only of political actors, but also of journalists and opinion leaders whose public positions are often viewed as shaping the direction of national conversations.