His comments have sparked conversations across the country, with many people wondering what really happened and what comes next.
The controversy began when the Tamale High Court, led by Justice Emmanuel Bart Plange Brew, directed that the Kpandai parliamentary results be set aside and a new election conducted.
The controversy began when the Tamale High Court, led by Justice Emmanuel Bart Plange Brew, directed that the Kpandai parliamentary results be set aside and a new election conducted.
Following the ruling, Parliament announced that the Kpandai seat was officially vacant and informed the Electoral Commission to prepare for another poll.
Nana B, however, believes the judgment was unfair and did not follow sound legal reasoning. Speaking to journalists in Accra, he questioned how the court handled the evidence presented during the case.
Nana B, however, believes the judgment was unfair and did not follow sound legal reasoning. Speaking to journalists in Accra, he questioned how the court handled the evidence presented during the case.
According to him, the judge placed too much weight on assumptions instead of relying strictly on facts.
He argued that the burden of proof was mismanaged, suggesting that the decision appeared more like an overreach of power than a proper interpretation of the law.
He argued that the burden of proof was mismanaged, suggesting that the decision appeared more like an overreach of power than a proper interpretation of the law.
In his view, the ruling lowered the standard required to challenge election results, which could set a worrying precedent for future cases.
Nana B also raised concerns about incidents that took place during the original election. He mentioned that there were reports of disturbances that forced electoral officials to relocate the collation centre.
Nana B also raised concerns about incidents that took place during the original election. He mentioned that there were reports of disturbances that forced electoral officials to relocate the collation centre.
He criticised the court for not paying attention to these issues and for failing to hold the petitioner responsible for actions that disrupted the process.
He added that the petitioner did not present a clear, credible tally to support claims of irregularities, yet the court still accepted what he considered weak and unverified allegations.
He added that the petitioner did not present a clear, credible tally to support claims of irregularities, yet the court still accepted what he considered weak and unverified allegations.
This, he said, created an impression that rumours and speculation were treated as solid evidence.
His comments have added fuel to an already tense political atmosphere. Many supporters of the NPP see the court ruling as a setback, while others believe it offers a chance for voters in Kpandai to make their voices heard again.
His comments have added fuel to an already tense political atmosphere. Many supporters of the NPP see the court ruling as a setback, while others believe it offers a chance for voters in Kpandai to make their voices heard again.
Meanwhile, the opposition has been reacting strongly as well, with some minority members expressing dissatisfaction with how Parliament declared the seat vacant.
The upcoming rerun, whenever the Electoral Commission sets the date, is expected to attract national attention.
The upcoming rerun, whenever the Electoral Commission sets the date, is expected to attract national attention.
Kpandai has often been a competitive constituency, and a repeat election will likely intensify campaigning from both major parties.