In a Facebook post shared on Sunday, February 8, 2026, Dr. Nduom reacted sharply to claims by some commentators that Nkrumah was “terrible for Ghana” because of certain decisions taken during his presidency.
Clearly unimpressed by the criticism, Nduom wrote: “Kwame Nkrumah was terrible for Ghana? May the Good Lord forgive you!”—a statement that has since gained wide traction online.
His intervention comes at a time when discussions about national symbols and historical legacy have re-emerged, following renewed calls to rename Ghana’s main international airport.
While some stakeholders support renaming the facility to Accra International Airport for neutrality, others believe it should instead honour Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, the man who led Ghana to independence in 1957.
Supporters of naming the airport after Nkrumah argue that his role in Ghana’s liberation struggle, industrialisation agenda, and Pan-African vision far outweighs the controversies associated with his rule.
They contend that key national infrastructure should reflect Ghana’s independence and ideological foundations rather than commemorate military figures linked to coups and periods of political instability.
However, critics of the proposal remain vocal. Prominent policy analyst Franklin Cudjoe and others have argued that Nkrumah’s administration mismanaged the economy, accumulated unsustainable debt, and introduced authoritarian tendencies that eventually contributed to his overthrow in 1966.
From this perspective, they insist that elevating Nkrumah through such a renaming risks glossing over historical mistakes.
Dr. Nduom’s comments have added fresh intensity to the debate, reinforcing how deeply divided public opinion remains over Nkrumah’s legacy, more than five decades after his removal from power.
Dr. Nduom’s comments have added fresh intensity to the debate, reinforcing how deeply divided public opinion remains over Nkrumah’s legacy, more than five decades after his removal from power.
To his supporters, Nkrumah remains the visionary architect of modern Ghana, whose long-term contributions cannot be reduced to short-term economic challenges. To his critics, he represents a cautionary tale of ambition unchecked by accountability.