The debate follows reports that CAF stripped Senegal of the championship title despite their victory over Morocco in the tournament’s final.
The development has shocked football fans across the continent and beyond, with many questioning the integrity of the decision and the processes behind it.
Speaking on Metro TV on March 18, 2026, Kwesi Pratt expressed disbelief over the situation, arguing that football results should be determined on the pitch rather than through administrative decisions.
He dismissed explanations that the action was based on regulatory procedures, insisting that such justifications do not align with the spirit of the game.
According to him, the decision undermines the credibility of African football governance and raises concerns about fairness and transparency within CAF. He further suggested that the controversy reflects deeper issues in how certain football matters are handled at the continental level.
Pratt also referenced reactions from Senegal, noting reports that officials there have resisted the decision and are unwilling to return the trophy. This response highlights the intensity of the dispute and the broader dissatisfaction surrounding the ruling.
The issue has sparked widespread debate among sports analysts, fans, and stakeholders, many of whom share concerns about the precedent such a decision could set.
Critics argue that reversing results after a final match could damage trust in competitions and reduce confidence in governing bodies.
In his remarks, Pratt also made broader observations about Morocco’s influence in football and political spaces, suggesting that certain developments linked to the country often generate controversy and raise questions.
The situation continues to unfold, with calls growing for CAF to provide clear and detailed explanations regarding its decision.
As pressure mounts, the controversy is expected to remain a major talking point in African football, with implications for governance, credibility, and the future of continental competitions.