Speaking on Adom FM’s Dwaso Nsem morning show, she explained that giving presidents extra years will not automatically improve governance.
Instead, she stressed the need to build strong systems that will keep leaders accountable and help them deliver results within the current four-year term.
“I do not support the idea of extending the presidential term. Even in America, where democracy is well-respected, presidents serve for only four years. If a leader is not performing, why should Ghanaians be forced to endure poor leadership for seven years?” she asked.
According to her, Ghana’s focus should be on building structures that support governance, rather than changing the constitution to extend mandates.
She suggested adopting practices such as appointing skilled spokespersons, strengthening institutions, and introducing shadow ministers with expertise to ensure leaders are guided by professionals in every sector.
“It doesn’t take seven years to change someone’s mindset. What we need are strong systems, policies, and good planning. It’s not about years; it’s about having a clear plan,” she emphasized.
Her comments come at a time when the debate on presidential term extension has gained public attention, with some arguing that four years is too short for leaders to achieve their vision.
However, critics like Nana Yaa Jantuah believe that leaders who cannot show results within four years may not necessarily perform better with additional time.
A number of political watchers agree with her position, pointing out that what Ghana needs most is continuity in policies, proper national planning, and accountability, regardless of who is in office.
Others argue that instead of changing the term, the country should focus on reducing wastage, fighting corruption, and ensuring that state resources are managed responsibly.