In a post on his official Facebook page, Noah shared a courtroom-themed image and raised concerns about whether the lawyer mentioned in the report was actually the renowned journalist and legal practitioner known by many Ghanaians.
His main concern was linked to the timing of the reported court proceedings. According to him, the article indicated that Samson Anyenini took part in a cross-examination during a period that usually falls within Ghana’s legal vacation.
This prompted him to question whether the report was accurate or whether there had been a change in the judicial calendar.
Noah pointed out that Ghana’s legal vacation period generally involves a break from normal court activities, with only urgent matters such as bail applications and injunction cases typically handled.
Because of this, the claim that a full trial involving cross-examination took place during that period appeared unusual to him.
The report in question involved a case concerning Kabiru Mahama and a contested NPP parliamentary primary, where a lawyer identified as Samson Anyenini was said to have participated in the proceedings.
However, Noah’s subsequent comments suggested uncertainty over the identity of the lawyer and the accuracy of the timeline presented in the article.
His remarks were made in a respectful but questioning manner, as he expressed admiration for Samson Anyenini’s reputation while seeking clarification about the report.
Samson is widely recognised as a journalist, host of Newsfile on JoyNews, and a legal practitioner known for his analysis of constitutional and governance issues.
The discussion surrounding Noah’s post has drawn attention from media and legal observers, with many emphasising the importance of verifying information before publication, particularly when it involves respected professionals and legal matters.
Some have also noted that online platforms sometimes republish content from different sources, which can create confusion over details such as authorship and timing.
Noah Tetteh’s comments highlight the importance of critical engagement with news reports and the need for accuracy in public communication.
His questions serve as a reminder that even widely circulated stories should be carefully examined, especially when they involve prominent figures and sensitive issues within the justice system.